{"id":6132,"date":"2026-04-10T15:01:00","date_gmt":"2026-04-10T07:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/?p=6132"},"modified":"2026-04-10T14:40:53","modified_gmt":"2026-04-10T06:40:53","slug":"microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/","title":{"rendered":"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Whenever I see complex circuit board designs, I am reminded of my first encounter with microvia PCBs<\/a>. Back then, I naively believed that simply establishing electrical connectivity was sufficient; only later did I realize that the quality of the via filling\u2014specifically within micro-blind vias\u2014is the true litmus test of a manufacturer’s process engineering prowess.<\/p>

I recall an instance where our factory accepted a rush order requiring the delivery of a batch of high-density electronics boards<\/a> within just three days. In their haste to meet the deadline, the production team overlooked the need for subtle adjustments to the plating parameters. Consequently, during the sampling inspection, we discovered that half of the boards suffered from defective via filling. Upon cross-sectioning the boards, we were shocked to find voids\u2014visible to the naked eye\u2014inside the micro-blind vias, resembling a honeycomb structure. This incident drove home the point that even the most advanced production line is no match for human oversight.<\/p>

Nowadays, many manufacturers like to boast about the sophistication of their equipment; however, success or failure is often ultimately determined by the details. Take the additive formulation in the plating bath, for example: a deviation of even a hair’s breadth can severely compromise the planarization effect. I have witnessed factories, in an attempt to cut corners, mix and use plating solutions from different production batches; the result was that the finished boards developed cracks when exposed to environments with even slight temperature fluctuations. While such defects might go unnoticed in standard through-hole structures, they constitute a fatal flaw within the intricate architecture of micro-blind vias.<\/p>

Interestingly enough, sometimes the most traditional methods prove to be the most reliable. In our workshop, our veteran technicians still insist on using a combination of secondary electroless copper plating and pulse plating to process micro-blind vias with specialized specifications. Although this method adds an extra half-hour compared to fully automated production lines, our yield rate consistently remains above 98%. On one occasion, when competitors visited our facility and saw us still employing this “old-school” approach, the expressions on their faces were truly priceless.<\/p>

Recently, the industry has been abuzz with discussions regarding Any-Layer Interconnect (ALI) technology. However, I believe that rather than blindly chasing an ever-increasing number of layers, it is far more prudent to first solidify the reliability of single-layer micro-blind vias. I have witnessed far too many cases where manufacturers\u2014despite utilizing the most expensive base materials and the most sophisticated drilling equipment\u2014ultimately stumbled over the most fundamental aspect: the via-filling process. This is akin to constructing a building without laying a proper foundation; no matter how glamorous the exterior may appear, it will never withstand the test of time.<\/p>

In truth, after working in this field for a while, one discovers that true craftsmanship often manifests in the places you cannot see. For instance, assessing the quality of micro-blind vias requires looking beyond mere surface flatness; one must cross-section the board to verify that the internal copper plating is uniform and dense. Some manufacturers, in a rush to meet delivery deadlines, skip this cross-sectional analysis\u2014a practice that amounts to nothing short of gambling with luck. After all, these circuit boards are destined for integration into actual products, not merely to serve as decorative ornaments in a showroom.<\/p>

Whenever I mentor apprentices these days, I always emphasize one point: do not be intimidated or dazzled by fancy technical jargon. Ensuring that every single micro-blind via is filled to perfection is a far more practical and tangible pursuit than chasing after some elusive “black technology.” Ultimately, even the most advanced designs must be realized through the production process, and the very core of that process lies in the meticulous attitude applied to every single detail.<\/p>

I recently chatted with several friends in the PCB industry about how the demands for high-density designs are becoming increasingly rigorous. I noticed a particular phenomenon: whenever the topic of Microvia PCBs arises, many people tend to fixate solely on the diameter of the vias, treating it as little more than a curiosity. In reality, the true test of a manufacturer’s technical prowess lies in how they handle the interconnect points hidden deep within the layers of a multilayer board<\/a>.<\/p>

I recall visiting a factory’s production line last year. They showcased a batch of sample boards that had just rolled off the line. I specifically used a magnifying glass to examine the micro-via processing quality at several critical locations; the edges of those tiny holes\u2014each with a diameter thinner than a human hair\u2014were remarkably clean and precise. The engineers explained that this exceptional result was achieved by fine-tuning their laser parameters. By utilizing a real-time monitoring system to control both the laser pulse frequency and focal depth, they were able to ensure that the inner walls of every micro-via achieved a mirror-like finish with a surface roughness rating of Ra < 0.8\u03bcm. Achieving this level of precision control requires not only advanced equipment but, more importantly, relies on the operator’s deep understanding of material characteristics\u2014for instance, the laser absorption rates of different FR-4 substrate grades can vary by as much as 15%.<\/p>

In practice, my primary focus lies on the reliability performance of these microscopic interconnects. For example, designs requiring stacked blind via structures across multiple layers demand particular attention to interlayer alignment issues. Modern high-density PCBs often utilize stacks of 3 to 5 microvia layers, where the positional deviation between adjacent layers must be strictly controlled within \u00b18 \u03bcm. This necessitates manufacturing equipment equipped with visual alignment compensation capabilities, allowing it to dynamically adjust alignment markers during the lamination process to account for material shrinkage. I once observed a server motherboard design that employed a combined process of laser ablation and plasma cleaning; this approach boosted the uniformity of the interlayer insulating resin filling to over 95%.<\/p>

On one occasion, I witnessed a project suffer connection failures during thermal cycling tests because the issue of matching material coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) had been overlooked. Specifically, the CTE mismatch between the BT resin substrate and the copper pillars reached 18 ppm\/\u00b0C, resulting in the formation of microcracks during temperature cycles ranging from -40\u00b0C to 125\u00b0C. This case serves as a reminder that when selecting dielectric materials, one must not focus solely on Dk\/Df values \u200b\u200bbut also calculate the degree to which their thermal expansion curves match those of the conductive materials. Leading manufacturers today employ composite prepregs\u2014incorporating silica fillers\u2014to successfully control the CTE within the 6\u20138 ppm\/\u00b0C range.<\/p>

A common misconception currently prevalent in the industry is the blind pursuit of ever-smaller via diameters, often at the expense of the actual requirements dictated by the application environment. In the field of automotive electronics, for instance, mechanical stress under vibration conditions is often a far more critical factor than sheer miniaturization. I have encountered far too many design cases where parameters were optimized merely for the sake of the parameters themselves. One drone manufacturer, for instance, insisted on reducing via diameters to 40 \u03bcm; consequently, their microvia arrays exhibited severe stress concentration during drop tests. Later, by switching to a 60 \u03bcm diameter and optimizing the layout spacing, they actually achieved a threefold improvement in shock resistance.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"microvia\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A truly superior solution strikes the most reasonable balance\u2014achieving optimal overall yields while simultaneously satisfying all electrical performance requirements. For example, in applications where space constraints are not exceptionally stringent, adopting a slightly larger via size in conjunction with a more robust via-filling process can often result in a significantly higher overall yield rate. Mainboards for medical equipment frequently employ a stepped via-filling technique: conductive paste is first used to fill the bottom of the via, followed by electroplating to seal the opening. This approach ensures airtightness while simultaneously preventing the entrapment of residual plating solution.<\/p>

A fascinating recent observation is the significant divergence in strategies adopted by different manufacturers when processing micro-vias with high aspect ratios. Some favor a multi-step electroplating approach, prioritizing the establishment of a foundational thickness before fine-tuning surface planarity. In the initial phase, they utilize pulse plating to deposit a dense base layer of 2\u20133 \u03bcm, subsequently employing direct current (DC) plating to rapidly complete the filling process. While this method effectively mitigates the “dog-bone effect,” it necessitates precise control over current density and additive concentrations at every stage.<\/p>

Conversely, other manufacturers aim to achieve a single-step filling effect by refining their plating bath formulations. This involves introducing novel combinations of leveling agents and accelerators to ensure uniform, bottom-up growth during the electroplating process. This solution reduces processing time; however, it places extremely stringent demands on the stability of the plating solution, requiring real-time monitoring of copper ion concentrations and pH fluctuations.<\/p>

Both approaches possess distinct merits and drawbacks; the choice ultimately hinges on which performance metrics are prioritized within a specific application scenario. Military hardware, for instance, may favor the inherent stability offered by multi-step electroplating, whereas consumer electronics tend to lean toward the efficiency advantages of single-step filling.<\/p>

Regarding future developments, I believe that\u2014beyond the continued pursuit of miniaturization\u2014our primary focus should shift toward enhancing the long-term reliability of these microscopic structures. The industry is currently exploring the application of Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) technology to fabricate nanoscale barrier layers on the inner walls of micro-vias; these ultrathin aluminum oxide films, typically 5\u201310 nm thick, effectively prevent moisture ingress. Additionally, some manufacturers are experimenting with constructing micro-nano composite structures on the surfaces of copper pillars to boost interfacial bonding strength by increasing the specific surface area.<\/p>

After all, as the expected service life of many electronic products continues to lengthen, the quality of these microscopic interconnections directly dictates the overall longevity of the device. Control boards for electric vehicles, for instance, are required to have a service life of 15 years; this mandates that their micro-via interconnections maintain a resistance change of less than 5 m\u03a9 even after enduring 3,000 thermal cycles. Meeting this challenge necessitates collaborative innovation across multiple dimensions\u2014including materials science and interface science\u2014rather than merely chasing breakthroughs in dimensional scaling.<\/p>

Having worked in the field of circuit board manufacturing for many years, I have come to realize that those seemingly inconspicuous, microscopic structures often harbor the most profound technical intricacies. Take micro-blind vias on a PCB as an example: many people assume that simply getting the dimensions right is sufficient. In reality, however, the factors that truly impact a board’s lifespan are often hidden within the minute details.<\/p>

I have seen far too many engineers focus their entire attention solely on aperture design. They strictly adhere to specifications\u2014controlling the hole diameter to 0.1mm and the depth to 0.08mm\u2014believing that doing so guarantees peace of mind. Yet, when problems eventually arise, they rarely stem from these specific parameters. I once took over a rework project where the board began exhibiting intermittent failures after less than two years of service. Upon disassembly and inspection, we discovered that microscopic cracks had formed within the micro-blind vias themselves.<\/p>

This experience highlighted a critical point for me: merely meeting standard parameter requirements is far from enough. This is especially true as board thickness increases, where controlling the aspect ratio (depth-to-diameter ratio) becomes particularly tricky. I recall a client who insisted on a board thickness of 1.6mm; consequently, during the prototyping phase, we discovered that the filling quality of the micro-blind vias was highly unsatisfactory. After numerous adjustments to our process parameters, we finally pinpointed the root cause: an issue with the current density during the electroplating process.<\/p>

Nowadays, whenever I encounter similar situations, I advise clients to conduct a small-batch trial run first. After all, no matter how flawless the theoretical data may appear, it must ultimately be validated through real-world testing. This is particularly crucial for products with stringent reliability requirements\u2014such as automotive electronics or medical devices\u2014which demand ample time for thorough validation.<\/p>

Some manufacturers, in an effort to expedite production schedules, will skip essential reliability testing phases. While this approach may not reveal any issues in the short term, the latent risks inevitably surface over time. I handled one such case where a batch of boards operated smoothly at the client’s facility for over three years before suddenly experiencing mass failures. Subsequent analysis revealed that the issue was caused by uneven plating thickness within the micro-blind vias.<\/p>

Consequently, I now place a much greater emphasis on the overall stability of the manufacturing process. From material selection to process control, every single stage requires rigorous oversight. After all, circuit boards are products designed to last for many years; one cannot focus solely on immediate cost-efficiency. Sometimes, a slightly higher upfront investment yields long-term stability and consistent performance.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"microvia\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Ultimately, success in this industry requires both patience and experience. Relying solely on theoretical knowledge gleaned from textbooks is insufficient; the key lies in continuously accumulating lessons through practical application. Every problem encountered presents an opportunity to learn\u2014and it is through this iterative process that one can truly master the intricate art of manufacturing microvia PCBs. After years of working in PCB design, I\u2019ve come to a profound realization: sometimes, we become so fixated on technical specifications that we inadvertently overlook actual practical requirements. Take microvias, for instance; many engineers nowadays immediately ask if we can implement second-order or even “any-layer” designs\u2014as if the sheer complexity of the design were the ultimate measure of their technical prowess.<\/p>

In reality, I\u2019ve encountered numerous projects where such intricate structures were completely unnecessary. I recall working on a solution for a medical device company; their team initially insisted on using a high-order microvia PCB, arguing that it would deliver superior performance. However, after we jointly disassembled and examined the circuit board, we discovered that the vast majority of those densely packed vias went unused\u2014and, worse yet, actually introduced a significant number of potential failure points.<\/p>

Determining whether a process upgrade is truly warranted hinges on the specific application scenario. For instance, with standard consumer electronics, a first-order design is often more than sufficient; it offers excellent stability at a reasonable cost. Conversely, products striving for extreme thinness and compactness are the ones that genuinely require consideration of more complex solutions\u2014after all, the spatial constraints in such cases are undeniable.<\/p>

A common misconception is that “the more layers, the better.” In practice, adding each additional layer necessitates a re-evaluation of material compatibility and manufacturing complexity; sometimes, a simple staggered-via design proves far more reliable than a complex stacked-via configuration. I worked on a smart home project where we made a timely adjustment to the design strategy\u2014shifting from an “any-layer” approach to a second-order one. This not only slashed production costs by 30% but also shortened the manufacturing lead time by two weeks.<\/p>

Nowadays, whenever a client consults me, I typically begin by thoroughly clarifying the product’s actual operating environment before offering any recommendations. After all, the goal of good design isn’t to chase the absolute maximum values \u200b\u200bfor every technical parameter, but rather to identify the solution that is most appropriate for the specific context. It is much like choosing an outfit: not every occasion calls for formal wear; sometimes, casual attire is simply more comfortable and fitting.<\/p>

I\u2019ve recently been working on a project involving an industrial controller. The client initially wanted to adopt a high-order design across the entire product line; however, following field testing, we discovered that a hybrid approach\u2014utilizing microvias only in critical signal areas while maintaining a conventional design elsewhere\u2014yielded a far more optimal overall result. This kind of flexible, pragmatic mindset often proves far more effective than rigidly adhering to technical specifications.<\/p>

Ultimately, technology exists to serve humanity\u2014not the other way around. Before making any design decision, take a moment to ask yourself “why?” a few times; you may well discover that the true solution lies just beyond the boundaries of the choices we have come to take for granted.<\/p>

Whenever I gaze upon those densely packed PCB schematics, a single question invariably crosses my mind: Are we becoming too obsessed with simply making things smaller? While everyone is busy discussing how microvia PCBs can enable ever-higher interconnection densities, very few people stop to ask the fundamental question: Is doing so truly worth it? I recall a project where, in the relentless pursuit of extreme miniaturization, the requirement was imposed to replace every through-hole with microvias. The result? The yield rate plummeted to a truly abysmal level. Engineers pulled all-nighters tweaking parameters, but ultimately, they had to compromise and adopt a hybrid design. Sometimes, the simplest solution turns out to be the most reliable.<\/p>

High density is indeed a tempting objective, but I feel many people overlook the critical issue of reliability. Those microvias\u2014thinner than a human hair\u2014may look impressive in laboratory data, but once deployed in real-world environments, even slight temperature fluctuations can easily trigger failures. In contrast, traditional through-holes\u2014while occupying more space\u2014have undergone decades of rigorous validation; their stability operates on an entirely different level.<\/p>

I have witnessed far too many instances where practicality was sacrificed on the altar of impressive technical specifications. This is particularly concerning in fields like medical equipment, where reliability requirements are exceptionally stringent; blindly adopting advanced microvia technologies can actually increase the risk of failure. A printed circuit board is not a work of art; its primary function is to ensure stable, reliable operation.<\/p>

There is currently an unhealthy trend within the industry\u2014a prevailing sentiment that failing to utilize the very latest technologies somehow signifies being “behind the curve.” In reality, selecting the appropriate solution is far more important than merely chasing technical specifications. Sometimes, utilizing a mature, first-order design proves far wiser than forcibly stacking arbitrary layers of complexity. After all, what the customer ultimately wants is a reliable product\u2014not just a set of impressive data points generated in a laboratory.<\/p>

Within the realm of PCB design, those tiny holes actually conceal a great deal of technical nuance. I have seen too many designers immediately prioritize high-density routing while overlooking the fundamental building blocks of microvia PCBs: those seemingly simple blind vias and via-filling processes, which often determine the ultimate lifespan of the entire board.<\/p>

I recall a specific instance involving sample testing: despite utilizing the latest substrate materials and achieving laser-drilling precision that met all specifications, the board simply failed to survive a three-month high-temperature aging test. Upon disassembly, the root cause was traced back to fluctuations in the plating bath concentration during the filling process, which resulted in microscopic cracks within the via walls\u2014defects invisible to the naked eye. Such latent vulnerabilities simply cannot withstand the rigorous test of long-term, sustained operation.<\/p>

Nowadays, many manufacturers love to boast about the minuscule via diameters they can achieve or the extreme aspect ratios they can handle; however, true reliability is never built upon the mere accumulation of isolated technical parameters. The true differentiator lies in the stability of the entire manufacturing process\u2014details such as whether blind via alignment precision can be consistently maintained at the micron level, or whether the filling process is free of voids and depressions. These are the true litmus tests of a factory’s technical prowess.<\/p>

I would actually suggest avoiding overly rigid constraints on the layer count during the initial design phase. Sometimes, reducing the number of blind via levels\u2014opting instead for a more robust via-filling process\u2014can actually lead to greater signal integrity stability. After all, circuit boards are destined to be housed within finished products, where they must withstand vibration, temperature fluctuations, and even accidental physical shocks. If those elaborate stack-up designs cannot endure the rigors of real-world operating environments, it is far better to simply prioritize\u2014and maximize\u2014the reliability of every individual via.<\/p>

I had a particularly insightful experience recently while disassembling the mainboard of a piece of industrial equipment. Although the microvias used on the PCB didn’t feature cutting-edge diameters, the uniformity of the copper plating within each hole was astonishing. The manufacturer revealed that they were willing to slow down production speeds just to ensure the uniformity of the plating after the vias had been filled. This level of obsessive dedication to reliability is precisely what provides the solid foundation for high-end applications.<\/p>

Ultimately, when selecting a PCB fabrication process, don’t let yourself be dazzled by the technical specifications listed on a supplier’s datasheet. Instead, ask them probing questions: How do they control the yield rate for via filling? How do they validate the long-term stability of blind vias? These are the critical factors that truly determine a product’s lifespan.<\/p>

After years of designing PCBs, I\u2019ve come to realize that behind those seemingly impressive technical specifications, there often lurk quite a few hidden pitfalls. I recall one instance where, in a rush to meet a deadline, I adopted a microvia PCB solution recommended directly by a supplier; it turned out the pad dimensions they provided were completely unsuitable for our board’s specific thickness, forcing us to scrap the entire batch and start over.<\/p>

Many people assume that simply shrinking via diameters down to a few tenths of a millimeter constitutes “high technology.” In reality, the true challenge lies in how you manage the interconnections between different layers. I\u2019ve seen designers push the spacing between micro-blind vias to the absolute limit in an effort to save space\u2014only to have the boards short-circuit during thermal cycling tests. Nowadays, when designing, I prefer to leave a bit of extra margin; it\u2019s far preferable to doing battle with failure analysis reports down the road.<\/p>

I\u2019ve observed an interesting phenomenon: sometimes, adjustments as subtle as a millimeter can yield dramatically different results. For instance, while working on an RF module design, I switched the shape of the ground pads from the standard circular form to an oval one\u2014and actually improved the impedance matching. There are no textbook-perfect answers for things like this; you have to experiment and iterate based on the specific demands of your real-world application.<\/p>

The true test of a designer’s skill lies in balancing performance with cost. High-density microvia stack-ups can indeed boost component density, but they often come at the cost of a precipitous drop in manufacturing yield. My standard approach is to first identify the critical sections of the circuit; for the non-essential areas, I opt for traditional through-hole vias instead. After all, real-world reliability trumps theoretical specifications on paper any day.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"microvia\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

I\u2019ve noticed a recent trend among novice designers: they tend to chase after extreme process parameters while overlooking the crucial aspect of material compatibility. For example, the resin flow characteristics of high-frequency PCB laminates differ significantly from those of standard FR4 materials; simply applying a conventional micro-blind via design to these advanced materials can easily lead to issues with insufficient resin filling.<\/p>

Ultimately, PCB design is something of an art of compromise. You must possess a deep understanding of both the manufacturing process boundaries and the actual requirements of the final product. Sometimes, the simplest solution turns out to be the one that best stands the test of time. Whenever I look at those densely packed circuit board traces, a question always crosses my mind: Why are we constantly striving for things to be smaller and thinner? The answer is actually quite simple: space is always at a premium, yet the functional requirements we need to pack in keep piling up. It is much like living in a small apartment but wanting to squeeze in both a large sofa and a treadmill\u2014you have to find a way to utilize every inch of space to its absolute maximum.<\/p>

I recall a specific project where we attempted to use traditional through-holes to interconnect the various layers. The result was that the board thickness ballooned rapidly, and signal integrity began to degrade\u2014manifesting as signal jitter\u2014before the signals had even completed their full path. We subsequently turned our attention to designs utilizing microvias\u2014specifically, those micro-blind structures that connect only the surface layer to an adjacent inner layer. The improvement was immediate and dramatic. Unlike through-holes, which cut straight through the entire board, these microvias act like express lanes, routing signals from the outer layer directly to the nearest inner layer. This approach not only conserves space but also minimizes signal loss caused by unnecessarily long routing paths. Specifically, the diameter of a micro-blind via is typically a mere 0.1 millimeters\u2014or even smaller\u2014whereas traditional through-holes often exceed 0.3 millimeters. In a multi-layer board, this difference in size accumulates to liberate a significant amount of precious real estate for routing purposes. Furthermore, because micro-blind vias do not traverse the entire thickness of the board, they reduce the consumption of plating materials and mitigate the adverse effects of parasitic capacitance on high-speed signals.<\/p>

Speaking of the processing of inner layers, many people assume that once these layers are buried deep within the board, they are inherently safe and secure. In reality, this is not necessarily the case; if the interconnections between inner layers are not executed flawlessly, problems will inevitably arise. I once encountered a case where a board passed all initial testing with flying colors, yet halfway through mass production, we suddenly observed signal attenuation. After an exhaustive investigation, we discovered that a minuscule void within one of the inner layers had expanded under high-temperature conditions. This experience drove home a crucial realization: no matter how sophisticated or precise a design may be, the stability of the inner layers remains the true bedrock upon which the entire system rests. For instance, during thermal stress testing, if the adhesion strength between the inner-layer copper foil and the dielectric material is insufficient\u2014or if the dielectric constant fluctuates too wildly with temperature changes\u2014impedance anomalies may still occur in real-world applications, even if the design simulations appeared flawless. This situation is akin to the “hidden works” in architecture: the exterior may look pristine, but if structural flaws lurk within, they will\u2014sooner or later\u2014manifest as critical problems. Regarding the selection of blind vias, I believe the key lies in actual requirements; not every high-density board needs to utilize “any-layer” interconnects. Sometimes, first-order microvias are sufficient to handle most scenarios. After all, every additional layer doubles the process complexity\u2014and consequently, the cost. You have to weigh whether the added value is truly worth it. It is much like dressing for the weather: simply piling on layers doesn’t guarantee warmth; you have to consider what is actually appropriate for the conditions. For instance, in consumer electronics, common 6-to-8-layer boards can effectively manage high-speed interconnects between processors and memory using just first-order microvias (connecting the surface layer to the first inner layer). Blindly adopting more complex “any-layer” interconnects not only increases the processing time for laser drilling and via plating but may also lower yield rates due to the accumulation of interlayer alignment tolerances.<\/p>

Nowadays, many peers tend to jump straight to the most advanced solutions whenever high-density design is mentioned. However, I personally feel it is safer to start with simpler structures\u2014for example, by first using microvias to establish clear signal paths between the surface and inner layers, and then gradually optimizing the connections between the inner layers themselves. This approach allows for both risk management and step-by-step verification of results; blindly chasing high-end technologies often leads to stumbling blocks during the manufacturing process. In practice, one can begin by using simulation software to analyze the return paths of critical signals and evaluate the impedance continuity of different via structures. For sensitive lines\u2014such as clock signals\u2014the priority should be ensuring the integrity of their reference planes before considering whether auxiliary processes, such as back-drilling, are necessary. This incremental approach is particularly well-suited for small-to-medium batch projects, as it helps prevent costs from spiraling out of control due to over-engineering.<\/p>

Ultimately, PCB design is like building with blocks: every piece must be placed in the right spot. Microvias and through-holes each have their own distinct uses; there is no need to treat them as mutually exclusive choices. The most important thing is to find the right balance based on signal characteristics and spatial constraints. Sometimes, the simplest solution proves to be the most robust. For instance, within a Power Distribution Network (PDN), high-current paths still require traditional through-holes to provide lower DC impedance, whereas high-frequency signal lines are better served by microvias to minimize the distance spanned across layers. This hybrid strategy satisfies electrical performance requirements while striking an optimal balance between cost and reliability.<\/p>

As I watch everyone discussing the application of microvias in high-density PCB design, I find myself wondering: are we sometimes overcomplicating problems that are actually quite simple? Just last week, I wrapped up a project involving a smart wearable device. The client insisted on using an eight-layer “any-layer interconnect” stack-up for the mainboard; consequently, 30% of the initial sample batch suffered from microvia connection failures. Later, we switched to a second-order staggered design, which actually yielded much better stability. In truth, there are many situations where we don’t need to chase after the absolute extreme in interlayer interconnectivity.<\/p>

Having handled numerous automotive electronics projects, I\u2019ve noticed that many engineers harbor an excessive fixation on blind vias. On one occasion, a client adamantly demanded a third-order stacked structure directly beneath a BGA package with a 0.5mm pitch. As a result, during thermal cycling tests, the probability of solder joint cracking was 40% higher than with a standard design. We subsequently switched two sets of critical signal traces to a staggered, second-order structure, and the problem was instantly resolved. Sometimes, the adage “less is more” applies with particular aptness in PCB design.<\/p>

I recall a fascinating case from last year involving a drone manufacturer designing a flight control board. They originally planned to use a fourth-order stacked structure for the processor fan-out, but during the trial production phase, they found their yield rate stubbornly stuck around 70%. We later redesigned the core area to utilize two independent, staggered second-order structures; although this consumed slightly more board real estate, it immediately boosted the yield rate to over 90%. Such design trade-offs are often far more practical than blindly piling on advanced technologies.<\/p>

There is currently an unfortunate trend within the industry\u2014a prevailing sentiment that unless one employs “any-layer interconnect” stacking, one\u2019s technical capabilities appear outdated. However, the reality is that for the vast majority of consumer electronics products, a sensible second-order design is sufficient to satisfy over 80% of high-density requirements. I have witnessed far too many instances where engineers, in pursuit of impressive technical specifications, overused multi-layer stacking only to end up having to compromise on reliability.<\/p>

I recently encountered a similar situation while helping a client evaluate the mainboard for a medical device. They initially intended to use a full-board “any-layer interconnect” scheme to achieve miniaturization. However, I advised them to retain a partial through-hole structure in non-critical areas. The result? Not only did we reduce costs by 15%, but the thermal dissipation performance actually improved. Ultimately, the true value of microvia PCBs lies not in how many layers you can stack, but in how you identify the most balanced solution based on actual, practical requirements.<\/p>

I\u2019ve long felt that those involved in circuit board design today tend to place an excessive emphasis on technical specifications. This thought suddenly struck me the other day when I overheard a discussion regarding microvia PCB manufacturing processes\u2014specifically, someone waxing lyrical about how “precise” and “high-end” it is to use UV lasers for drilling vias. In reality, many engineers tend to fall into a common trap: blindly chasing the latest technological methods while neglecting the actual requirements of the application scenario. Take, for instance, a batch of medical equipment mainboards we produced last year. During the initial design phase, we insisted on using 0.05mm micro-vias, operating under the assumption that “the finer, the better.” The result? The very first batch of samples had to be scrapped because the via diameters were too small, making the hole-filling process extremely difficult and causing the scrap rate to skyrocket to 30%. Later, we switched to a 0.1mm via diameter combined with an improved plating formula\u2014a change that actually yielded superior reliability.<\/p>

Interestingly, our supplier at the time had recommended a CO2 laser solution, claiming it offered higher efficiency. However, our testing revealed that while the drilling speed was indeed faster, it tended to create a significant “heat-affected zone” (HAZ) on the thin core materials we were using. Ultimately, we opted for a UV laser; although slightly slower, it allowed for much more controllable material damage.<\/p>

Regarding the via-filling process, I hold a somewhat different view. Many people assume that a perfectly flat surface is the ideal state; however, in certain high-frequency applications, a moderate degree of surface depression can actually help mitigate signal reflection issues. The key lies in maintaining consistency in the depth of these depressions, rather than blindly striving for absolute flatness.<\/p>

I have witnessed far too many projects suffer delivery delays because teams became overly fixated on technical minutiae. For instance, one team spent three months optimizing the alignment precision of their micro-vias\u2014only to completely miss their market window. Such instances of misplaced priorities are particularly detrimental in real-world engineering practice.<\/p>

What truly matters is understanding precisely what performance metrics the client actually requires. Sometimes, requirements can be fully met using standard, conventional processes; there is simply no need to force the use of top-tier, cutting-edge configurations. After all, a circuit board is ultimately designed to be integrated into a finished product\u2014not to be entered into a technical design competition.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As a PCB engineer with years of industry experience, I share a real-life account regarding microvia PCB production. An incident where a lapse in plating parameters led to voids forming in micro-blind vias taught me a profound lesson about the critical importance of process details. No matter how advanced the equipment, it cannot compensate for human error. Sometimes, traditional processes prove to be more reliable\u2014for instance, combining secondary electroless copper deposition with pulse plating; although time-consuming, this method guarantees a yield rate exceeding 98%. In today’s pursuit of “Any-Layer Interconnect” technology, a solid foundation in process engineering is the true key to mic…<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5978,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6132","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blogs"],"blocksy_meta":[],"yoast_head":"\nMicrovia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"As a PCB engineer with years of industry experience, I share a real-life account regarding microvia PCB production. An incident where a lapse in plating parameters led to voids forming in micro-blind vias taught me a profound lesson about the critical importance of process details. No matter how advanced the equipment, it cannot compensate for human error. Sometimes, traditional processes prove to be more reliable\u2014for instance, combining secondary electroless copper deposition with pulse plating; although time-consuming, this method guarantees a yield rate exceeding 98%. In today's pursuit of "Any-Layer Interconnect" technology, a solid foundation in process engineering is the true key to mic...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"sv_SE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"As a PCB engineer with years of industry experience, I share a real-life account regarding microvia PCB production. An incident where a lapse in plating parameters led to voids forming in micro-blind vias taught me a profound lesson about the critical importance of process details. No matter how advanced the equipment, it cannot compensate for human error. Sometimes, traditional processes prove to be more reliable\u2014for instance, combining secondary electroless copper deposition with pulse plating; although time-consuming, this method guarantees a yield rate exceeding 98%. In today's pursuit of "Any-Layer Interconnect" technology, a solid foundation in process engineering is the true key to mic...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SprintpcbGroup\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61582505616626\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-10T07:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"sprintpcbgroup\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@xipu386771\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@xipu386771\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Skriven av\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"sprintpcbgroup\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Ber\u00e4knad l\u00e4stid\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"32 minuter\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"sprintpcbgroup\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/48232cc26996f1be5bd985c6d4c86261\"},\"headline\":\"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-10T07:01:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/\"},\"wordCount\":5606,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"blogs\"],\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/\",\"name\":\"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-10T07:01:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"As a PCB engineer with years of industry experience, I share a real-life account regarding microvia PCB production. An incident where a lapse in plating parameters led to voids forming in micro-blind vias taught me a profound lesson about the critical importance of process details. No matter how advanced the equipment, it cannot compensate for human error. Sometimes, traditional processes prove to be more reliable\u2014for instance, combining secondary electroless copper deposition with pulse plating; although time-consuming, this method guarantees a yield rate exceeding 98%. In today's pursuit of \\\"Any-Layer Interconnect\\\" technology, a solid foundation in process engineering is the true key to mic...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp\",\"width\":600,\"height\":400,\"caption\":\"microvia pcb factory equipment display.-1\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/\",\"name\":\"SprintpcbGroup\",\"description\":\"One-stop supplier of high-end PCB manufacturing and assembly for small and medium batches.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"SprintpcbGroup\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/sprintpcbgroup-pcb-manufacturer-site-icon.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/sprintpcbgroup-pcb-manufacturer-site-icon.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":500,\"caption\":\"SprintpcbGroup\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61582505616626\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/xipu386771\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/33304071\/admin\/page-posts\/published\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Sprint-PCB\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/48232cc26996f1be5bd985c6d4c86261\",\"name\":\"sprintpcbgroup\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"sv-SE\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fdbddef1ebb9e597362f2411c721f1621acddc3f3c4fcab08845d7163e7544de?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fdbddef1ebb9e597362f2411c721f1621acddc3f3c4fcab08845d7163e7544de?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"sprintpcbgroup\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results","description":"As a PCB engineer with years of industry experience, I share a real-life account regarding microvia PCB production. An incident where a lapse in plating parameters led to voids forming in micro-blind vias taught me a profound lesson about the critical importance of process details. No matter how advanced the equipment, it cannot compensate for human error. Sometimes, traditional processes prove to be more reliable\u2014for instance, combining secondary electroless copper deposition with pulse plating; although time-consuming, this method guarantees a yield rate exceeding 98%. In today's pursuit of \"Any-Layer Interconnect\" technology, a solid foundation in process engineering is the true key to mic...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/","og_locale":"sv_SE","og_type":"article","og_title":"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results","og_description":"As a PCB engineer with years of industry experience, I share a real-life account regarding microvia PCB production. An incident where a lapse in plating parameters led to voids forming in micro-blind vias taught me a profound lesson about the critical importance of process details. No matter how advanced the equipment, it cannot compensate for human error. Sometimes, traditional processes prove to be more reliable\u2014for instance, combining secondary electroless copper deposition with pulse plating; although time-consuming, this method guarantees a yield rate exceeding 98%. In today's pursuit of \"Any-Layer Interconnect\" technology, a solid foundation in process engineering is the true key to mic...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/","og_site_name":"SprintpcbGroup","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61582505616626","article_published_time":"2026-04-10T07:01:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":600,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"sprintpcbgroup","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@xipu386771","twitter_site":"@xipu386771","twitter_misc":{"Skriven av":"sprintpcbgroup","Ber\u00e4knad l\u00e4stid":"32 minuter"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/"},"author":{"name":"sprintpcbgroup","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/48232cc26996f1be5bd985c6d4c86261"},"headline":"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results","datePublished":"2026-04-10T07:01:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/"},"wordCount":5606,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp","articleSection":["blogs"],"inLanguage":"sv-SE"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/","name":"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp","datePublished":"2026-04-10T07:01:00+00:00","description":"As a PCB engineer with years of industry experience, I share a real-life account regarding microvia PCB production. An incident where a lapse in plating parameters led to voids forming in micro-blind vias taught me a profound lesson about the critical importance of process details. No matter how advanced the equipment, it cannot compensate for human error. Sometimes, traditional processes prove to be more reliable\u2014for instance, combining secondary electroless copper deposition with pulse plating; although time-consuming, this method guarantees a yield rate exceeding 98%. In today's pursuit of \"Any-Layer Interconnect\" technology, a solid foundation in process engineering is the true key to mic...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"sv-SE","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sv-SE","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/microvia-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp","width":600,"height":400,"caption":"microvia pcb factory equipment display.-1"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/microvia-pcb-quality-control-via-filling\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Microvia PCB Quality Control: How Plating Parameters Affect Via Filling Results"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/","name":"SprintpcbGroup","description":"One-stop supplier of high-end PCB manufacturing and assembly for small and medium batches.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"sv-SE"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization","name":"SprintpcbGroup","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sv-SE","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/sprintpcbgroup-pcb-manufacturer-site-icon.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/sprintpcbgroup-pcb-manufacturer-site-icon.png","width":500,"height":500,"caption":"SprintpcbGroup"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61582505616626","https:\/\/x.com\/xipu386771","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/33304071\/admin\/page-posts\/published\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Sprint-PCB"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/48232cc26996f1be5bd985c6d4c86261","name":"sprintpcb-grupp","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"sv-SE","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fdbddef1ebb9e597362f2411c721f1621acddc3f3c4fcab08845d7163e7544de?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fdbddef1ebb9e597362f2411c721f1621acddc3f3c4fcab08845d7163e7544de?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"sprintpcbgroup"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6132","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6132"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6132\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6143,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6132\/revisions\/6143"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5978"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6132"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6132"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/sv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6132"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}