<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>SprintpcbGroup</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.sprintpcbgroup.com/fi</provider_url><author_name>sprintpcbgroup</author_name><author_url>https://www.sprintpcbgroup.com/fi/author/sprintpcbgroup/</author_url><title>Overlooked Practical Issues in PCB-on-PCB Design</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="To942s5gWx"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.sprintpcbgroup.com/fi/blogs/pcb-on-pcb-design-practical-issues/"&gt;Overlooked Practical Issues in PCB-on-PCB Design&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.sprintpcbgroup.com/fi/blogs/pcb-on-pcb-design-practical-issues/embed/#?secret=To942s5gWx" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201D;Overlooked Practical Issues in PCB-on-PCB Design&#x201D; &#x2014; SprintpcbGroup" data-secret="To942s5gWx" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://www.sprintpcbgroup.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;</html><thumbnail_url>https://www.sprintpcbgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/pcb-on-pcb-manufacturing-equipment-1.webp</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>600</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>400</thumbnail_height><description>When PCB-on-PCB stacking designs encounter real-world environments, laboratory data often fails to predict on-site conditions. We've experienced signal attenuation due to differences in material thermal expansion coefficients and seen high-frequency performance degradation caused by subtle variations in coating thickness. Instead of pursuing extreme testing conditions, we should focus on the gradual temperature changes in actual use scenarios. Interface flatness is often more critical to stacking stability than novel materials; these lessons learned are worth considering for every hardware engineer.</description></oembed>
