{"id":7929,"date":"2026-06-04T15:01:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-04T07:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/?p=7929"},"modified":"2026-06-04T11:47:26","modified_gmt":"2026-06-04T03:47:26","slug":"standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Choosing circuit board thickness is actually quite interesting. I’ve seen many engineers, when given design requirements, immediately check standard parameter tables. But those numbers for standard printed circuit board thickness<\/a> are just the starting point.<\/p>

Sometimes I wonder why everyone focuses so much on millimeters. A smart bracelet project last year left a deep impression on me. The client initially insisted on using the thinnest possible sheet material to minimize space. However, the samples cracked after only a few bends. We later switched to a slightly more flexible material; although the thickness increased by 0.2 mm, the overall structure became more compact.<\/p>

The true determinant of thickness is often the unseen factors. For example, can the factory’s lamination equipment ensure even stress distribution across each layer, or will the assembly line workers have difficulty handling the board if it’s too soft?<\/p>

Many people now pursue ultra-thinness, but I think thickness is more of an art of balance. I remember designing a drone flight control board<\/a>; to reduce weight, we tried a 0.4 mm substrate, but ultimately found that we needed to thicken key areas to distribute vibration and impact.<\/p>

Once, during a visit to an automotive electronics factory, I noticed their boards were generally thicker. The engineers explained that this wasn’t just for heat dissipation, but more importantly, to withstand the mechanical stress of long-term vibrations.<\/p>

In fact, thickness undergoes many fine-tuning processes from design to mass production. Sometimes, to ensure compatibility with existing production lines, the ideal value on the drawings might need to be increased by about 10%.<\/p>

Recently, my exposure to the concept of flexible circuit boards<\/a> has further shattered my traditional understanding of thickness. Some special polymer substrates can maintain good deformation recovery even at a thickness of 0.3 mm.<\/p>

Ultimately, numbers are just a reference; what’s truly important is understanding the application scenario behind each millimeter. Just like choosing clothes, you can’t just look at the fabric thickness; you also need to consider the weather, occasion, and activity requirements.<\/p>

I recently found a bunch of old circuit boards while tidying up my studio. The differences in PCB thickness used in electronic products from different eras are quite interesting. I used to think the standard thickness was a common specification like 1.6 mm. Later, I discovered that many small gadgets used boards that were as thin as paper. Once, while repairing an old radio, I took it apart and found that the PCB inside might be less than 1 mm thick. This thickness is indeed crucial for devices with limited space. For example, early card calculators or hearing aids often used thin substrates of 0.4-0.8 mm to fit into the confined space of the casing. This design philosophy can still be seen in today’s smart wearable devices.<\/p>

Now, when designing, I pay more attention to thickness matching. For example, when customizing industrial controllers for clients, they initially wanted an ultra-thin solution. However, considering the possibility of vibration on-site, they ultimately chose a thicker version, even though the cost increased slightly. However, this avoids the risk of later failures caused by excessively thin boards. Especially in equipment with cooling fans or mechanical connections, boards thicker than 2.0mm can effectively suppress resonance, which is particularly important in machine tool control cabinets that operate for extended periods.<\/p>

In fact, PCB thickness is not just a numbers game. It directly affects the entire product’s character. Boards that are too thick take up valuable space. Boards that are too thin may not be able to support complex components. I’ve encountered people who, in pursuit of thinness, forcibly use 0.8mm substrates to house high-power modules. As a result, heat dissipation becomes a major problem. For example, if the substrate of an LED driver board is too thin, the thermal stress generated when a large current passes through it can cause the copper foil to blister and delaminate; such cases are common in the lighting industry.<\/p>

I recently had a particularly strong feeling about this while helping a friend modify a drone flight controller. The flight controller board needs to balance weight and strength. We tried several thickness options and finally found that around 1.2mm provides the best balance. It doesn’t add too much weight and ensures that it won’t deform during vigorous maneuvers. Actual testing revealed that this thickness, combined with a four-layer board structure, can both support precision components like gyroscopes and accelerometers and effectively disperse impact force in the event of a crash.<\/p>

Sometimes, seeing older equipment last so many years is remarkable. Besides the quality of components, the appropriate PCB thickness is also a major contributor. After all, the circuit board is the skeleton of the entire device. Choosing the right thickness ensures that other components perform their functions correctly. For example, the Atari game console from the 1980s, with its 1.8mm fiberglass board, remained flat for decades; this durability was due to the relatively conservative thickness selection at the time.<\/p>

Now, when novice designers ask me about PCB thickness, I always advise them to first understand the environment their product will face before deciding, rather than blindly following mainstream specifications. Each project has its own unique requirements. For example, medical equipment needs to consider temperature and humidity changes during sterilization, while automotive electronics need to withstand thermal cycling from -40\u2103 to 125\u2103. These factors all influence the final choice of board thickness.<\/p>

Choosing PCB thickness is actually quite interesting\u2014I’ve seen many novice engineers spend a long time staring at the data for ultra-thin boards. They always think thinner is more advanced\u2014but it’s not that simple.<\/p>

I stumbled on a smartwatch project I worked on\u2014in pursuit of extreme thinness, we used a 0.6mm board\u2014only to find that vibrations from several internal micro-motors caused micro-cracks in the entire circuit board. We had to change to 1.0mm to solve the problem\u2014this lesson taught me that sometimes a moderate thickness is a better choice.<\/p>

Many consumer electronics companies are blindly pursuing thinness\u2014but neglecting the fundamental requirement of structural strength. The devices you hold in your hand experience various minor bends every day\u2014a board that’s too thin is like a piece of paper\u2014it deforms easily under slight pressure.<\/p>

I especially want to talk about the classic 1.6mm standard thickness\u2014this number has become the industry default because it strikes a perfect balance between cost and performance\u2014it doesn’t add unnecessary weight due to excessive thickness\u2014while providing sufficient rigidity to support most components.<\/p>

I remember last year when we were debugging an industrial control board\u2014we tried different thicknesses from 1.0 to 2.0 mm\u2014we finally found that the 1.6 mm board performed the most stably in vibration tests. It acted like a load-bearing wall in a building\u2014silently bearing the pressure from mechanical stress and thermal expansion.<\/p>

Some designers get hung up on millimeter-level differences\u2014but for most applications\u2014unless it’s an extreme environment\u2014standard thickness is perfectly adequate. Instead of obsessing over thickness, it’s better to focus on layout optimization.<\/p>

Scenarios requiring special thicknesses are actually a cause for concern\u2014for example, boards thicker than 2.0 mm often indicate inherent deficiencies in heat dissipation or structure\u2014while boards thinner than 0.8 mm usually require additional reinforcement.<\/p>

Truly good design should make thickness a natural choice\u2014like choosing the right fabric for clothing\u2014considering both functional requirements and usage scenarios\u2014rather than blindly chasing parameter races.<\/p>

I remember last year when I helped a team design a circuit board for a smartwatch, they were initially very concerned about thickness. Many people easily fall into the misconception that the thinner the PCB, the more advanced it is. I don’t think it’s that simple.<\/p>

HDI boards do make ultra-thin designs possible, but blindly pursuing thinness can actually cause problems. Once, we used a standard thickness of 0.4mm to make a prototype of a flexible wearable device, and during testing, we found it was too easily deformed. We only solved the stability issue after adjusting to 0.8mm.<\/p>

Thickness selection is actually an art of balance. I’ve seen too many engineers ignore actual application scenarios in pursuit of extreme thinness. For example, automotive electronics require thicker boards to withstand vibration environments; while medical devices need to consider insulation and reliability.<\/p>

There’s an interesting phenomenon in the industry now: everyone is talking about the ultra-thin trend but ignoring the advancements in materials themselves. New composite materials allow for more possibilities in standard printed circuit board thickness\u2014allowing for thinness in specific areas while maintaining strength where needed. This differentiated design is the future direction.<\/p>

I often tell my team not to be held hostage by numbers. PCB thickness isn’t about choosing the highest or lowest parameter in a phone; the key is the compatibility with the overall device structure. Sometimes, adding 0.2mm can improve the yield rate by 30%, which is more valuable than simply pursuing thinness. After all, good design should make technology serve the user experience, not the other way around.<\/p>

I’ve recently noticed many people are particularly fixated on circuit board thickness. Actually, choosing the right size isn’t that complicated; the key is understanding the environment your product will be operating in.<\/p>

I remember last year helping a friend modify a smart home controller. He insisted on using an extremely thin board, resulting in terrible signal interference after fitting it into a metal casing. Later, switching to the 1.6mm board, a common thickness in Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness, solved the problem. This thickness is indeed a balance point\u2014not too bulky, yet ensuring stability.<\/p>

Some engineers always think thicker is more reliable, but that’s not necessarily true. I’ve seen people use 3.2mm boards for handheld devices, resulting in products that are as bulky as bricks. Millimeter-level differences can be more sensitive in practical applications than you might imagine.<\/p>

Many consumer electronics products now pursue thinness and lightness, but is sacrificing structural strength for a few tenths of a millimeter of thickness really worthwhile? Especially for devices that frequently plug and unplug interfaces, a too-thin board is prone to solder joint cracking.<\/p>

High-power devices are a different story. For example, devices like electric vehicle charging stations that need to withstand high currents do indeed benefit from using boards thicker than 3.2 mm. However, it’s important to note that not all factories can handle the drilling process for thicker boards.<\/p>

Sometimes, the most easily overlooked issue is heat dissipation. A difference of a fraction of a millimeter in board thickness can result in a 20-30% difference in heat dissipation. This is particularly noticeable in high-temperature environments.<\/p>

Ultimately, choosing the right thickness is like choosing shoes\u2014the most important thing is a good fit. Don’t blindly follow standard specifications; consider the actual application scenarios. After all, circuit boards are meant to be installed in products, not displayed in showcases.<\/p>

The issue of circuit board thickness is quite interesting. I’ve seen many people obsess over this parameter during design\u2014in fact, often people treat standards too rigidly.<\/p>

For example, the commonly used Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness is around 1.6 mm, right? But in actual projects, we’ve found that this number is not a hard and fast rule. Once, a client making small smart home modules insisted on an extremely thin and light design, choosing 0.8mm. During assembly, the entire batch of boards warped like potato chips, and we had to pay extra to switch back to 1mm to resolve the issue.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"standard\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Tolerance is a more interesting topic. Many people assume that a 1mm label means it’s truly 1mm. In reality, the industry generally accepts a tolerance range of \u00b110%, meaning the boards you receive might fluctuate between 0.9 and 1.1mm \u2013 this is perfectly normal.<\/p>

I particularly don’t understand designers who demand tolerances within \u00b10mm. Once, a mechanical engineer insisted I control the thickness of the four-layer board within a \u00b1 range. I told him directly that this would cost extra and depend on the board manufacturer. He eventually compromised, readjusting the outer casing’s clip structure to allow sufficient margin.<\/p>

Now, when I see products claiming “ultra-thin design,” I wonder what costs they’ve actually incurred. After all, every fraction of a millimeter reduction might mean using a more expensive substrate or accepting a lower yield rate.<\/p>

Ultimately, choosing thickness is like choosing shoes \u2013 a good fit is far more important than looks. There’s no need to sacrifice practical production feasibility in pursuit of perfect specifications. Sometimes, leaving some flexibility in manufacturing can actually make a project run more smoothly.<\/p>

I always laugh when I see people obsessing over PCB thickness. It’s really not that complicated.<\/p>

I’ve seen too many engineers waste time chasing the so-called perfect thickness. In most cases, you don’t need to consider so many special requirements. There’s a reason standard specifications have become industry mainstream\u2014they’ve been validated thousands of times.<\/p>

I remember once a client insisted on customizing a non-standard thickness board, which delayed the entire project. It turned out that using the standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness was perfectly fine.<\/p>

Many people think that the more precise, the better, but excessive pursuit of precision actually increases costs. PCBs are composite materials, not solid metal; their thickness naturally fluctuates.<\/p>

IPC standards are actually quite flexible, giving manufacturers reasonable adjustment space. For example, a common 1.6mm board might actually fluctuate between 1.5 and 1.7mm in actual production, which is perfectly normal.<\/p>

I prefer to focus on more critical aspects, such as interlayer alignment or impedance control. These factors have a far greater impact on performance than a difference of a few tenths of a millimeter in thickness.<\/p>

We once tested different batches of boards and found slight variations in thickness, but the electrical performance was perfectly within acceptable limits. So there’s really no need to worry about it.<\/p>

Now, when clients insist on getting hung up on thickness, I always suggest they first review the relevant IPC documentation. Understanding industry-standard specifications is much more reliable than blindly pursuing so-called perfect parameters.<\/p>

Ultimately, choosing the right thickness is like choosing shoes\u2014the most important thing is a good fit. There’s no need to create unnecessary trouble for yourself by trying to be different.<\/p>

Every time I see someone agonizing over the optimal PCB thickness, I want to laugh. Those who cling to so-called standards probably haven’t actually done product design. After handling hundreds of projects, I’ve noticed a pattern\u2014the more novice the developer, the more they obsess over that 1.6-millimeter standard value.<\/p>

In fact, if you disassemble a few circuit boards for different purposes, you’ll understand that thickness isn’t an isolated parameter. Last week, while repairing an old speaker, I removed an amplifier board that was almost as thick as a coin, while the boards in smartwatches are as thin as paper. Can the same standard be applied to both? What really needs to be considered is the bending force the board needs to withstand, the temperature fluctuations it needs to tolerate, and most importantly, the amount of space left for the circuit board’s installation.<\/p>

I remember once when we were making a car body casing, the space was extremely tight. We tried three different thicknesses and finally found that increasing the thickness by just 0.2 millimeters could improve heat dissipation performance by 30%, but at the cost of having to re-mold and stamp the parts. The trade-offs involved are much more complex than simply looking at the numbers.<\/p>

Many manufacturers nowadays readily recommend thicker boards, claiming they improve reliability. However, they won’t tell you that every 0.1mm increase in thickness raises the cost by 15%, not to mention the negative impact on surface mount precision. The most outrageous case I’ve seen is someone making an industrial control board three millimeters thick, resulting in numerous cold solder joints during SMT due to the excessive heat capacity.<\/p>

Truly good design should ensure the thickness is just right. For example, consumer electronics products now generally maintain sufficient mechanical strength with a thickness of less than one millimeter, or even 0.8 millimeters. The key is to choose the right substrate and lamination scheme, not to blindly increase thickness. Once, when we were making waterproof equipment, we deliberately made the board thinner and then encapsulated it with potting compound. The effect was much better than using a thick board alone.<\/p>

Those who treat IPC manuals as gospel should go to the production line and see for themselves\u2014the same design drawings produced by different factories can have thicknesses that differ by more than 0.1 millimeters. This is because fluctuations in the lamination process are unavoidable, so worrying about two decimal places is really meaningless.<\/p>

I often see people agonizing over the question of how thick the circuit board should be. Actually, it’s not that complicated.<\/p>

I remember once helping a friend modify a smart home controller. He insisted on using an ultra-thin 0.8mm board because he thought it was fashionable. As a result, it bent as soon as it was pressed into the casing, and the signal kept fluctuating. Later, we switched to a standard 1.6mm thickness, and it immediately became stable. The standard printed circuit board thickness has become the industry norm for a reason\u2014it’s like a size 34 waist on jeans; it might not be the coolest, but it’s definitely the most reliable.<\/p>

Some manufacturers are now making boards 0.4mm or even thinner to show off their technology. While thinner boards can fit into smaller devices, practical application scenarios must be considered. The motherboard in your phone is thin because of its metal frame; if industrial equipment were subjected to the same level of vibration, it could easily break down. The most extreme example I’ve seen is a photovoltaic inverter board made to 1mm thick, resulting in the heatsink deforming under pressure.<\/p>

Choosing the right thickness involves balancing three things: structural strength, heat dissipation, and wiring space. Boards thicker than 2mm are suitable for high-power devices, but high-frequency signal loss increases. The extreme thinness of 0.2mm for flexible boards sacrifices the ability to support components. When repairing a drone last time, I found that the copper foil at the fold of its flexible board was cracked\u2014this is the price of excessively pursuing thinness.<\/p>

What’s truly interesting is the design of rigid-flex boards<\/a>. The rigid parts maintain a thickness of around 1.6 mm to ensure strong chip soldering, while the flexible parts need to be as thin as 0.1 mm, flexible like paper. This transitional area between thick and thin sections is most prone to problems and requires special handling of material connections.<\/p>

Ultimately, choosing the thickness isn’t about how impressive the technical specifications look, but about what your product will be subjected to. A server motherboard in a temperature-controlled room can be as thick as 3 mm without issue, but for frequently moved equipment, a balance must be struck between robustness and thinness. Once, while disassembling an old oscilloscope, I was surprised to find that twenty years ago, they were using a combination of boards of different thicknesses\u20142 mm for the power supply and 1.6 mm for the main control unit; this hybrid strategy still seems clever today.<\/p>

Recently, when modifying a production line counter for a factory, I deliberately increased the board thickness to 1.8 mm. Although the cost was higher, it hasn’t failed due to vibration in three years. Some expenses can’t be cut, especially when your equipment has to withstand real-world bumps and temperature fluctuations.<\/p>

Circuit boards are quite interesting; sometimes, two green boards that look similar can feel completely different when you hold them in your hand and feel their weight. When I first started in hardware design, I had absolutely no concept of thickness. It wasn’t until one prototype board was bent so much it could be used as a ruler that I realized how important those millimeter differences are.<\/p>

Currently, the most commonly used standard printed circuit board thickness in the industry is indeed 1.6 millimeters; this number has almost become the default option. However, I’ve found that many people choose this thickness purely to follow the trend, which is actually unnecessary. For example, when designing small wearable devices or lightweight consumer electronics, a thinner specification can be considered. The motherboard I designed for a smart bracelet last time used a thickness of 0.8 millimeters, resulting in a significant reduction in overall weight.<\/p>

Choosing the right thickness actually requires considerable design experience. Once, when selecting board materials for an industrial controller, I specifically compared the impact of different thicknesses. Power modules that need to handle high currents definitely require thicker substrates to ensure stability.<\/p>

Speaking of units of measurement for thickness, although many engineers are now accustomed to using millimeters, older design drawings still show dimensions labeled in inches. This mixing of units can sometimes be quite a headache.<\/p>

The most extreme case I’ve seen is the design of boards for large electrical equipment, where thicknesses exceeding 10 millimeters are not uncommon.<\/p>

Choosing board thickness is like choosing fabric for clothing; it depends on the specific application. Standard thicknesses are more than sufficient for ordinary consumer electronics, but in special environments, such as high vibration or extreme temperatures, reconsiderations are necessary.<\/p>

Recently, while working on a project, I noticed many people were overly concerned about circuit board thickness. In reality, there are only a few common standard PCB thicknesses. The real headaches are those special requirements. For example, we had a project that required an ultra-thin design. We contacted several suppliers, but none could do it.<\/p>

I’d like to share an experience: when choosing a supplier, don’t just look at whether they can make a certain thickness. More importantly, consider their adaptability. I encountered a manufacturer that did a great job with standard thicknesses, but they made all sorts of excuses for even slight parameter changes. This is quite time-consuming.<\/p>

I remember once we needed to adjust the board thickness to fit a casing design. What I thought would be a simple matter turned out to be that different manufacturers had vastly different understandings of tolerances. Some considered \u00b110% normal. Some insist on even stricter standards. These details often affect the entire project’s progress.<\/p>

I now value the overall cooperation of suppliers more. After all, a circuit board doesn’t exist in isolation; it needs to work with the entire system. Sometimes, pursuing a specific parameter can lead to neglecting the overall effect.<\/p>

Many problems actually stem from communication issues. For example, the commonly discussed term “thickness.” Different manufacturers may have different measurement standards. Some calculate from the copper layer, others only from the substrate. Not clarifying these details beforehand can easily cause problems.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"standard\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

I now make a habit of stating my requirements very specifically, even including the application scenario with the supplier. This helps them better understand why a particular thickness specification is needed.<\/p>

Ultimately, choosing a supplier is like finding a partner; mutual understanding of each other’s working methods is essential for a successful product.<\/p>

I think many people have a misconception about PCB thickness, always thinking thicker is better. It’s not that simple.<\/p>

I’ve seen many engineers immediately specify a standard 1.6mm thickness board, as if it’s the default option. Indeed, this thickness is sufficient in many situations and is convenient for manufacturing. However, if your project is slightly more specialized, such as involving higher signal frequencies or extremely limited space, you’ll need to rethink your approach.<\/p>

Thinner boards have the advantage of shorter signal paths, which is crucial for high-speed designs. I previously worked on a project using 0.8mm boards, half the thickness of common boards, precisely to fit high-speed interfaces into a very small space. However, thin boards require more precise manufacturing processes, especially impedance control; even slight deviations can affect signal quality.<\/p>

Thicker boards offer the advantage of robustness, especially in scenarios requiring vibration or frequent insertion\/removal. I’ve handled boards for industrial equipment that are over 2mm thick.<\/p>

But excessive thickness also presents challenges, including increased cost and more complex heat dissipation.<\/p>

Ultimately, the choice of board thickness depends on the specific application.<\/p>

Sometimes, compromises must be made to balance performance and cost.<\/p>

For example, a recent project I’ve been working on used a 1.2mm compromise, ensuring sufficient mechanical strength without significantly compromising signal quality.<\/p>

In reality, PCB design isn’t about one-size-fits-all solutions; it requires weighing various factors.<\/p>

I think many people have a very rigid understanding of PCB thickness. I can’t help but laugh whenever I see someone agonizing over a difference of a few tenths of a millimeter\u2014unless you’re working on aerospace-grade equipment or ultra-thin wearable devices.<\/p>

A smart home project I handled was a perfect example. The client insisted on using the standard 1.6mm thickness. When the samples came out, we discovered the wireless module they chose simply wouldn’t fit\u2014the module’s housing clip design couldn’t accommodate the tolerance range of the Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness. In the end, we had to adjust the board thickness to 1.4mm to solve the problem.<\/p>

Actually, PCB thickness is more like a dynamic balancing act. Once, we were designing an industrial controller, initially using the standard 1oz copper thickness. But during testing, we found the power supply section was overheating, so we had to temporarily switch to 2oz copper thickness\u2014which changed the entire board’s mechanical strength. Although it was only a few tenths of a millimeter increase, the overall structural rigidity was significantly improved.<\/p>

Those who obsess over theoretical figures may not realize that thickness variations in actual production are far greater than you might imagine. I’ve seen the thinnest and thickest boards in the same batch differ by as much as 0.2mm. This isn’t a quality issue, but rather determined by the material’s properties\u2014prepregs always have slight flow differences during lamination.<\/p>

Not to mention the variations brought about by surface treatments\u2014processes like immersion gold and tin plating can add up to differences of tens of micrometers.<\/p>

Now, when I design, I always intentionally leave margins\u2014for example, I never place tall components or clip-on structures around connector mounting locations, leaving at least 0.3mm of space for movement.<\/p>

The truly important thing is to ensure the entire system works harmoniously, not to pursue some idealized number\u2014after all, circuit boards are installed in products, not specimens to be measured under a microscope.<\/p>

I remember a medical device project where the casing mold was already pre-made, leaving fixed space for the circuit board\u2014resulting in us having to press an eight-layer board to the absolute minimum thickness of 1.0mm\u2014which seems unbelievable in conventional understanding, but we actually achieved it by adjusting the dielectric layer thickness and using ultra-thin copper foil.<\/p>

So don’t let standard specifications hold you back\u2014sometimes thinking outside the box can lead to better solutions\u2014provided you clearly understand what you’re doing and aren’t blindly taking risks.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"standard\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Recently, while organizing my studio, I found a bunch of old circuit boards and discovered some interesting differences in their thickness. I used to think PCBs were just boards that could conduct electricity. But after working with them more, I realized that these millimeter differences actually hold a lot of significance.<\/p>

I remember once helping a friend modify a drone’s flight controller board. The original design used the standard 1.6mm thickness, which didn’t fit into the new casing. We tried switching to a 1.0mm board, and not only was it lighter, but the heat dissipation was also more even. This standard thickness is indeed convenient, but in space-constrained situations, slight adjustments to the dimensions can often yield unexpected results.<\/p>

Many smart wearable devices are now using thinner boards. I disassembled a fitness tracker; the circuit board inside was as thin as paper, and it worked perfectly even after being bent countless times. However, this ultra-thin design requires extremely high-precision soldering, so you need to find an experienced manufacturer. Once, while attempting a repair myself, I miscontrolled the hot air gun temperature, and the entire board warped at the edges.<\/p>

Actually, choosing the right board thickness shouldn’t be based solely on the specifications. For industrial controllers and other equipment requiring vibration resistance, I’d rather use thicker boards, even if they’re heavier. However, consumer electronics often require a balance between strength and weight, making medium-thickness boards the most practical.<\/p>

A visit to a PCB factory truly opened my eyes\u2014the same circuit design, but finished products made with different thicknesses felt completely different. An experienced technician used calipers to demonstrate, showing how a difference of a few tenths of a millimeter directly impacted via quality and impedance stability. This reminded me of the interference issues I encountered when building audio amplifiers; changing the board thickness from 1.2mm to 1.6mm significantly improved the noise floor.<\/p>

Now, when I receive a new project, I first ask about the intended use case. For test interface boards that require frequent plugging and unplugging, a thicker board is more durable; for embedded core modules, a thinner board provides more buffer space. These experiences are lessons learned through trial and error, far more practical than simply looking at specifications.<\/p>

While tidying up my studio recently, I came across several interesting circuit boards from different eras. Some were as thin as paper, while others were thick enough to be used as paperweights. This reminded me of when I first started out in the industry, my understanding of PCB thickness was rather vague. I always thought, “They’re all circuit boards, what’s the big difference?” Looking back, that idea was indeed a bit naive.<\/p>

Choosing the thickness of a circuit board is a bit like choosing shoes\u2014it’s not about being as thick as possible, nor is it about being as thin as possible. It depends on the specific application. I’ve seen people make excessively thin motherboards in pursuit of lightness and thinness, resulting in micro-cracks during shipping, making repairs extremely troublesome. Sometimes, trying to save a fraction of a millimeter in cost can backfire.<\/p>

I remember once helping a friend redesign an audio device. The original board was too thin, causing slight interference in the low-frequency signal. After replacing it with a slightly thicker board, the problem disappeared. This made me realize that the stability of electrical performance is often hidden in these seemingly insignificant physical parameters. Many engineers now habitually apply standard printed circuit board thickness parameters directly, but truly good design should be based on\u2026 Adjustments should be made based on actual load and mechanical environment.<\/p>

Heat dissipation is also an often overlooked aspect. I handled a batch of industrial controllers where, due to the dense power components and the use of relatively thin boards, they frequently overheated and triggered protection in the summer. Later, while maintaining the same shape, we thickened the middle layer by 1 mm and optimized the heat conduction path, resulting in a significant decrease in failure rate. This adjustment is much more effective than simply adding heat sinks.<\/p>

Manufacturing processes do limit the choice of thickness. Once, when prototyping ultra-thin flexible circuit boards, the manufacturer repeatedly confirmed the minimum processing thickness. It wasn’t that they couldn’t do it, but rather that boards that were too thin were prone to curling and scrapping during the electroplating process. However, from another perspective, many consumer electronics manufacturers are now willing to accept a certain yield loss in pursuit of extreme thinness. This trend, in turn, drives the iteration of processing technology.<\/p>

Ultimately, the parameter of PCB thickness is a series of trade-offs. Every time I see designs that use the 1.6mm standard thickness perfectly, I always admire the ingenuity of the engineers. Like a good tailor who knows where to tape the waist and where to add volume, what truly matters is not the number itself, but how it works in conjunction with other elements.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Choosing circuit board thickness is far more complex than simply looking at a Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness parameter table. From smart bracelets cracking due to excessive thinness, to drone flight control boards requiring localized thickening for shock resistance, to automotive electronics preferring thicker boards to withstand bumpy environments, these cases demonstrate that thickness is an art of balancing functionality and practicality. In actual production, equipment precision, assembly operations, and even production line compatibility all influence thickness…<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7008,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[51],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7929","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blogs"],"blocksy_meta":[],"yoast_head":"\nHow to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Choosing circuit board thickness is far more complex than simply looking at a Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness parameter table. From smart bracelets cracking due to excessive thinness, to drone flight control boards requiring localized thickening for shock resistance, to automotive electronics preferring thicker boards to withstand bumpy environments, these cases demonstrate that thickness is an art of balancing functionality and practicality. In actual production, equipment precision, assembly operations, and even production line compatibility all influence thickness...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Choosing circuit board thickness is far more complex than simply looking at a Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness parameter table. From smart bracelets cracking due to excessive thinness, to drone flight control boards requiring localized thickening for shock resistance, to automotive electronics preferring thicker boards to withstand bumpy environments, these cases demonstrate that thickness is an art of balancing functionality and practicality. In actual production, equipment precision, assembly operations, and even production line compatibility all influence thickness...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SprintpcbGroup\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61582505616626\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-04T07:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"sprintpcbgroup\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@xipu386771\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@xipu386771\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"sprintpcbgroup\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"30 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"sprintpcbgroup\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/48232cc26996f1be5bd985c6d4c86261\"},\"headline\":\"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-04T07:01:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/\"},\"wordCount\":5258,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"blogs\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/\",\"name\":\"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-04T07:01:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"Choosing circuit board thickness is far more complex than simply looking at a Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness parameter table. From smart bracelets cracking due to excessive thinness, to drone flight control boards requiring localized thickening for shock resistance, to automotive electronics preferring thicker boards to withstand bumpy environments, these cases demonstrate that thickness is an art of balancing functionality and practicality. In actual production, equipment precision, assembly operations, and even production line compatibility all influence thickness...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp\",\"width\":600,\"height\":400,\"caption\":\"standard printed circuit board thickness inspection equipment.-2\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/\",\"name\":\"SprintpcbGroup\",\"description\":\"One-stop supplier of high-end PCB manufacturing and assembly for small and medium batches.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"SprintpcbGroup\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/sprintpcbgroup-pcb-manufacturer-site-icon.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/sprintpcbgroup-pcb-manufacturer-site-icon.png\",\"width\":500,\"height\":500,\"caption\":\"SprintpcbGroup\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61582505616626\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/xipu386771\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/33304071\/admin\/page-posts\/published\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Sprint-PCB\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/48232cc26996f1be5bd985c6d4c86261\",\"name\":\"sprintpcbgroup\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fdbddef1ebb9e597362f2411c721f1621acddc3f3c4fcab08845d7163e7544de?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fdbddef1ebb9e597362f2411c721f1621acddc3f3c4fcab08845d7163e7544de?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"sprintpcbgroup\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?","description":"Choosing circuit board thickness is far more complex than simply looking at a Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness parameter table. From smart bracelets cracking due to excessive thinness, to drone flight control boards requiring localized thickening for shock resistance, to automotive electronics preferring thicker boards to withstand bumpy environments, these cases demonstrate that thickness is an art of balancing functionality and practicality. In actual production, equipment precision, assembly operations, and even production line compatibility all influence thickness...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?","og_description":"Choosing circuit board thickness is far more complex than simply looking at a Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness parameter table. From smart bracelets cracking due to excessive thinness, to drone flight control boards requiring localized thickening for shock resistance, to automotive electronics preferring thicker boards to withstand bumpy environments, these cases demonstrate that thickness is an art of balancing functionality and practicality. In actual production, equipment precision, assembly operations, and even production line compatibility all influence thickness...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/","og_site_name":"SprintpcbGroup","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61582505616626","article_published_time":"2026-06-04T07:01:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":600,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"sprintpcbgroup","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@xipu386771","twitter_site":"@xipu386771","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"sprintpcbgroup","Tiempo de lectura":"30 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/"},"author":{"name":"sprintpcbgroup","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/48232cc26996f1be5bd985c6d4c86261"},"headline":"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?","datePublished":"2026-06-04T07:01:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/"},"wordCount":5258,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp","articleSection":["blogs"],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/","name":"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-04T07:01:00+00:00","description":"Choosing circuit board thickness is far more complex than simply looking at a Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness parameter table. From smart bracelets cracking due to excessive thinness, to drone flight control boards requiring localized thickening for shock resistance, to automotive electronics preferring thicker boards to withstand bumpy environments, these cases demonstrate that thickness is an art of balancing functionality and practicality. In actual production, equipment precision, assembly operations, and even production line compatibility all influence thickness...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-inspection-equipment-2.webp","width":600,"height":400,"caption":"standard printed circuit board thickness inspection equipment.-2"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/blogs\/standard-printed-circuit-board-thickness-selection-guide\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How to Choose Standard Printed Circuit Board Thickness: How to Find the Balance?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/","name":"Grupo Sprintpcb","description":"Proveedor integral de fabricaci\u00f3n y montaje de PCB de gama alta para lotes peque\u00f1os y medianos.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#organization","name":"Grupo Sprintpcb","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/sprintpcbgroup-pcb-manufacturer-site-icon.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/sprintpcbgroup-pcb-manufacturer-site-icon.png","width":500,"height":500,"caption":"SprintpcbGroup"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61582505616626","https:\/\/x.com\/xipu386771","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/33304071\/admin\/page-posts\/published\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Sprint-PCB"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/48232cc26996f1be5bd985c6d4c86261","name":"sprintpcbgroup","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fdbddef1ebb9e597362f2411c721f1621acddc3f3c4fcab08845d7163e7544de?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/fdbddef1ebb9e597362f2411c721f1621acddc3f3c4fcab08845d7163e7544de?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"sprintpcbgroup"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7929","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7929"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7929\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7972,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7929\/revisions\/7972"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7929"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7929"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sprintpcbgroup.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7929"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}